“Tu hai kya cheez… Delhi Women Judge Threatened In Open Court By Convict and Lawyer After Cheque Bounce Verdict
A Delhi woman judge faced threats and abuse in open court from a convict and his lawyer after delivering a conviction in a cheque bounce case on April 2.
Judicial Magistrate (NI Act) Shivangi Mangla was subjected to verbal abuse and life threats by a 63-year-old retired school teacher and his counsel, Atul Kumar, after she convicted the former under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The accused, enraged by the ruling, allegedly tried to throw an object at the judge and warned her with chilling threats.
“Tu hai kya cheez… tu bahar mil, dekhte hai kaise zinda ghar jaati hai,” the convict shouted at Judge Mangla, according to the court’s order, as reported by Bar and Bench.
The man’s counsel allegedly did not restrain his client, and instead joined in with offensive remarks and attempts to intimidate the judge, reportedly urging her to reconsider the verdict under pressure.
The judge noted in her written order that the accused and his lawyer hurled repeated insults, including derogatory remarks about her mother. She stated that the duo subjected her to mental and physical harassment, clearly aimed at coercing her into resigning from her judicial role.
Judge Mangla remained resolute, stating that she would not be deterred by the threats. “The undersigned shall be taking appropriate measures against the accused before the National Commission for Women, Delhi for such threatening and harassment,” the order read.
In response to the courtroom misconduct, the judge issued a show cause notice to advocate Atul Kumar. The lawyer has been asked to explain in writing why criminal contempt proceedings should not be initiated against him for his behavior.
“Court notice be issued to counsel for accused Sh. Atul Kumar… to explain as to why he shall not be referred to the Hon’ble High Court for initiating criminal contempt proceedings,” the court stated. He has been directed to submit his response on the next date of hearing.
The conviction was issued under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which penalizes dishonor of cheques due to insufficient funds. Section 437A CrPC, under which the convict was asked to furnish bail bonds, requires an accused to remain available for legal proceedings post-conviction.
Courtroom intimidation, particularly against women judges, has drawn sharp criticism in recent years, with calls from the legal fraternity for stronger protections and swift action against contempt of court.
Further legal action is expected against both the convict and his counsel. The matter is likely to be referred to the Delhi High Court for potential contempt proceedings. The National Commission for Women is also expected to take cognizance of the harassment allegations.
