Elon Musk’s DOGE Cuts $21M for Voter Turnout in India: BJP Alleges Electoral Interference

In a surprising turn of events, the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), under the leadership of Elon Musk, has declared the cancellation of a $21 million US funding program intended to boost voter turnout in India. This decision comes as part of broader budget cuts aimed at reducing US government expenditure, echoing Musk’s warnings about the fiscal health of America.

The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) was quick to react, with its leaders questioning the intent behind such funding. BJP’s national spokesperson, Amit Malviya, took to X to voice concerns, stating, “Who gains from this? Not the ruling party for sure!” This statement reflects a suspicion of foreign influence in India’s electoral process, sparking a debate on the integrity of national elections.

DOGE’s announcement didn’t stop at India. It also included the cancellation of a $29 million initiative for “strengthening the political landscape in Bangladesh,” highlighting a pattern of cutting funds for international political activities. According to DOGE’s post on X, “US taxpayer dollars were going to be spent on the following items, all of which have been cancelled,” indicating a significant policy shift towards fiscal conservatism under the Trump administration’s oversight.

ALSO READ | Delhi Police Release Names Of 18 People Who Died in New Delhi Railway Station Stampede

This move by DOGE comes shortly after a meeting between Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and US President Donald Trump, where discussions revolved around enhancing India-US relations. However, this particular cut wasn’t part of the public discourse during their talks, possibly indicating that these financial decisions are made at a more operational level rather than during high-profile diplomatic engagements.

Musk has been vocal about the need for budget cuts, often stating that without them, “America would go bankrupt.” His approach seems to be influencing DOGE’s operations, focusing on efficiency and reducing what might be seen as ‘questionable’ overseas expenditures.

This incident raises questions not only about international funding but also about the transparency and motives behind such financial decisions. While the US aims to reduce its fiscal deficit, the implications for international relations, especially with countries like India, could be significant. The BJP’s response suggests that there might be political repercussions or at least a need for clearer communication on such matters.