Waqf Bill : Joint Parliamentary Committee Submitted Report To Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla

In a significant parliamentary move, the joint committee tasked with examining the Waqf (Amendment) Bill has officially submitted its report to Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla. The submission was made by the committee chairperson, Jagdambika Pal, at the Parliament House on Thursday.

The report, which was adopted by a slim majority vote of 15-11, has stirred considerable controversy. It includes amendments suggested primarily by members of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), aiming to modernize, enhance transparency, and ensure accountability in the management of Waqf properties across India. These properties, which include religious and charitable endowments under Muslim law, are managed by Waqf boards in each state.

However, the opposition has voiced strong objections, describing the amendments as an assault on the constitutional rights of the Muslim community. They argue that the changes could lead to governmental interference in the religious and administrative autonomy of Waqf boards. This has resulted in opposition members, who voted against the adoption of the report, submitting dissent notes, highlighting their disagreement with the proposed changes.

ALSO READ | Desi Jugaad in Canada: Gujarati Man’s Balcony Becomes a Fridge, Beats High Bills

The Waqf (Amendment) Bill, introduced in the Lok Sabha in August of the previous year, has been a contentious topic. The BJP maintains that the legislation is crucial for bringing much-needed reform to the often opaque management of Waqf properties, potentially reducing corruption and mismanagement. They argue that these changes align with the principles of good governance and will benefit the community by ensuring that Waqf properties are managed efficiently and for the public good.

On the flip side, critics from the opposition see these reforms as a political maneuver to control Muslim religious institutions, potentially disenfranchising the community by altering the composition and functioning of the Waqf boards. This debate underscores a broader national discussion on the intersection of religion, law, and governance in India.

As the bill moves forward, it will be scrutinized in further parliamentary sessions, where the fate of these amendments will be decided. This process will not only affect how Waqf properties are managed but also set a precedent for how similar religious endowments might be legislated in the future.